Prescription of "Release of media control" required for China
Wuhan Public Security Police shed hoax on the Internet
In fact, eight people who were detained as physicians at the site of Wuhan,
If their information is quickly shared with society, not hoaxes or fabrications
Transmission could have been prevented more
In view of this, the Beijing Youth Report and other Chinese media also reported,
Public opinion is starting to touch on the issue of hoaxes and information hiding.
Citizen reporters and healthcare professionals,
The state that the body and the patient are housed together in the hospital on SNS ,
Uncontrolled medical settings,
Spread of hospital-acquired infections in healthcare professionals who have fallen asleep due to insomnia
And began to complain.
In addition, Chinese internet entrepreneurs and doctors have been
Rumors of a virus leak due to human error
Began to appeal to explain this properly.
Previously contributed a paper on coronavirus experiments to Nature and others
Deputy Chief of Wuhan Virus Research Institute
Virus researcher Shi Zhengli of
WeChat's group chat denies the spread of the infection and involvement of the institute
However, some doctors have been sick of managing the animal experiments at the virus laboratory,
The processing of the corpses of experimental animals was sloppy,
Experimental animals are taken out for pets,
He pointed out the problem that experimental chicken eggs were eaten as boiled eggs.
In response to this, the famous internet entrepreneur Suzunami is a real name
He suggested that he accuse him of giving reasons for doubting the virus institute.
In the Xi Jinping administration, up to now,
We have thoroughly removed such transmissions on SNS and strictly controlled them
However, such information control has begun to collapse.
We continue to send Wuhan's actual situation on SNS ,
Once arrested, citizen reporter Fang Bin was released by public opinion,
It keeps sending even after being released.
Xi Jinping to tackle the Glasnost China edition
Urban functions are down, healthcare is down, citizens are skeptical,
In the surrounding area, exclusions with lynching are performed on humans from Hubei and Wuhan
There are also villages and regions.
Even with support from the international community, the Wuhan Red Cross does not work,
The supplies were not distributed fairly, and three Hubei Red Cross executives were dismissed due to neglect.
The best silver bullet for this social disruption, dysfunction and panic
"Correct information".
Conversely, without information disclosure, transparency and free coverage of the media,
Government trust cannot be regained.
The three major reasons that the system is dismantled at the end of the tyranny are
Economic collapse, military governance failure, and major public health incidents
Wang Juntao , a Chinese democracy activist in the United States,
He pointed out at the Voice of America and thought it was.
For example, one of the causes of the collapse of the Soviet Union
The 1986 Chernobyl nuclear accident was a major public health incident.
"Correct information" is indispensable to calm the panic caused by the public health incident.
Gorbachev General Secretary of the Soviet Communist Party is Glasnost
(Information disclosure) by releasing media control and speech control
They tried to calm the panic.
The confusion that began with the information hiding of SARS in 2003
The ban on Chinese media coverage was lifted in April and May .
However, in the case of SARS , confusion converged relatively quickly.
So in July, media controls became stricter again
However, in the case of this new type of pneumonia, the scale is too large.
Moreover, in the severe under the control of Xi Jinping regime
If the spirit of journalism in the media, which has been depressed for many years, is released at once,
Isn't it easy to turn back?
In this situation, the release of media control and speech control in China, liberalization of the press
Isn't it going, that is, going to the Chinese version of Glasnost?
And may it follow a path very similar to the scenario where the former Soviet Union collapsed,
That it to faint expected such as me, but unwillingly Xi Jinping regime is so sweet,
And admonish yourself.
However, if you do not decide to disclose information,
China People's distrust of Xi Jinping regime also, bureaucratic dysfunction is also not repaired,
"China that expands new pneumonia by hiding information and exports to the world"
That can distrust from the international community has recovered.
Then China will be able to
It will have to be cut off from the international community.
Either way, there is only severe consequences for the Xi Jinping regime
But what is better for Chinese people who are terrified of the fear of infection is:
The former is easy for the international community to cooperate and actively support for relief.
Again Xi Jinping TairaSo secretary, here crossing the Chinese version of glasnost, not to extend their power,
Finally play a leader who works for the security of the lives of the people
Xi Jinping, Why not leave a name in history?
Sometimes it's no longer Japanese media
The biased reports are terrible, and there are also fabrications, and sometimes the information you want to know is not included.
I think it is dangerous.
Some weird news.
Approval 82
Opposition 5
Prime Minister Li Keqiang Head of Countermeasures
Do you want to take full responsibility if something happens?
Approval 20
Opposition 1
Hong Kong and Taiwan media began reporting in mid- December
It was pretty big in early January
Already, information on Chinese government cover-up and outbreaks was being handled
I knew that the Japanese mass media was crazy in China
I want to know why Mr. Fukushima didn't treat you big
Approval 19
Opposition 2
I want to maintain one-party dictatorship, a dictatorship by Xi Jinping
I think that information control is more sophisticated, precise and strict,
Just controlled based on someone's convenient story.
A natural story.
In recent times, raw information has reached the people directly,
The view that the turning point is approaching here,
Isn't it a biased view of the living side in the media and journalism?
For screens such as TVs and PCs ,
It is also true that the images and images are no longer able to be swallowed as they are seen,
At that time, the people at that time should be looking for a source of information to be based.
If you keep it tight, control can be said to be easier.
New pneumonia information from China is suspicious look
However, the information originating in Japan is somehow trusted.
Also, the development of 5G and 6G information and communication technology
Along with that, various information utilization tools were born,
If used properly, wouldn't it be easier to control the people?
Approval 11
Opposition 2
All that said, China will be more vigilant and stricter in media control.
Approval 11
Opposition 2
Information control is a matter of life and death of the CCP.
They can't keep bad things without concealing them.
So the West must set up an information war on China.
Approval 11
Opposite 0
Communist in China.
Otherwise, a riot more than Hong Kong could occur somewhere every day.
Obtaining and sharing information freely is a matter of communism
"They don't want the people to do it."
Not only in the Chinese Communist Party, but also in state systems such as North Korea and Russia, they are more or less the same.
So like " VOA " "The United States is so free"
Is considered to be effective
In fact, people under such a state system trying to know the world
There is no choice but to listen on the radio.
If you think "I don't have that,"
Communist China still gives disadvantageous information to the Communist Party
When the overseas version NHK tries to flow, the radio wave is cut off,
You must know the fact that.
Approval 10
Opposition 1
China exports all wrongdoing to the world
Naturally separated from the international community.
There is no doubt that this is the BIG opportunity for democratization of China!
Approval 9
Opposite 0
Democracy is an inefficient system, but the opinions of the field are respected.
The nation is managed by incorporating things like "collective wisdom".
In a one-party dictatorship dictator-oriented system, "collective intelligence" does not work,
It is too late like this time.
We should be prepared for worse control over the press in the future.
Approval 7
Opposite 0
I know what I mean, but it's not realistic because it's at the heart of the Communist Party.
Approval 5
Opposite 0